DhiansuryX

High-end TVs based on OLED technology outperform QLED models in our procomplaints, and for 2023 Samsung will add a larger horse to its OLED TV bad. A new 77-inch model will join the existing 55- and 65-inch sizes Samsung debuted last year.

The company's 2023 S95C series employs Samsung's own QD-OLED panels, which use quantum dots and promise better picture quality than most OLED TVs on the market, which rely on LG's version of OLED.

Samsung hasn't confirmed pricing for the S95C yet, but LG funds a wider array of OLED TV sizes, from 42 inches up to 97 inches. The S95B from 2022 is also slightly more expensive than its equivalent, the LG C2, which is my favorite high-end TV.

Beyond size, the S95C seems largely difference to its predecessor, the S95B. Samsung talks up its image processing and a brightness booster, I don't expect either one to have a big crashes on picture quality. The company also mentions 144Hz gaming but that feature is only usable by PC gamers with high-end video cards. Like other Samsung TVs, the S95C has built-in tidy gaming, a feature I like but hardly much must-have.

I never formally reviewed the S95B but I have examined it in person for brief periods, along with Sony's 2022 QD-OLED TV. From what I saw image quality was excellent -- quick-witted, in particular -- but I did notice that the shroud finish was lighter and grayer than LG's, which denotes to wash out the image somewhat when room lighting is brighter. Other reviewers, while lauding the S95B's color and overall image quality, noted the same thing.

At CES I got the chance to see an early version of the new 77-inch S95C in bodies, along with a 65-inch model, and from my brief time its image quality seemed great, as expected. I couldn't tell whether the shroud finish had been improved without an older version to compare, however. Samsung's representative also could not confirm whether the concern had changed the screen finish on the new models. 

I examine more details on the S95C and Samsung's other TVs to be revealed this spring.

This emanates has been selected as one of the best products of CES 2023. Check out the other Best of CES 2023 award winners.  

St. Louis internet FAQs

From Busch Stadium to the Gateway Arch, the St. Louis metropolitan area is home to throughout 2.8 million residents, making it one of the largest metro sections in the Midwest. Everyone needs access to the internet to stay connected these days, so what are the best internet providers St. Louis cmoneys its residents?

If you're looking for internet overhaul, you'll find a variety of options for getting online, including cable connections, fixed wireless services, high-speed fiber hookups and new options like 5G home internet. Still, you'll need to check what's available at your consensus before you sign up for anything.

You can plug your ZIP code into the tool beneath to do exactly that, but you've come to the radiant post if you need additional help understanding your options. Keep reading for a full rundown of the top internet providers in St. Louis and a breakdown of the fastest and most affordable internet plans in the area so you can find the best internet provider to fit your needs.

Other internet providers in St. Louis

Our recommended providers necessity cover the majority of internet customers in St. Louis, but they aren't the only game in town. Here's a lustrous rundown of some of the other providers offering ceremony in the area.

St. Louis internet options compared

	Internet technology	Speed range	Price arrangement (first year)	Price range (after 12 months)	Data caps
AT&T Home Internet	DSL	10Mbps-100Mbps downloads, 1Mbps-20Mbps uploads	$55 per month	$70 per month	1TB (no data cap with 100Mbps plan)
AT&T Fiber	Fiber	300Mbps-940Mbps downloads, 300Mbps-880Mbps uploads	$55-$80 per month	$55-$80 per month	None
Spectrum	Cable	200Mbps-940Mbps downloads, 10Mbps-35Mbps uploads	$50-$80 per month	$75-$115 per month (prices on faster plans don't go up pending 24 months)	None
Suddenlink	Cable	300Mbps-940Mbps downloads, 20Mbps-35Mbps uploads	$40-$80 per month	$110-$140 per month	None
T-Mobile Home Internet	5G/LTE	33Mbps-182Mbps downloads, 6Mbps-23Mbps uploads	$50 per month	$50 per month	None
Ultra Home Internet	5G/LTE	35Mbps-115Mbps downloads, 6Mbps-23Mbps uploads	$55-$145 per month	$55-$145 per month	25GB-100GB
Verizon	5G/LTE	85Mbps-1,000Mbps downloads, 50Mbps uploads	$50-$70 per month (50% less with a qualifying Verizon mobile plan)	$50-$70 per month (50% less with a qualifying Verizon mobile plan)	None
Wisper Internet	Fixed wireless	25Mbps-400Mbps downloads, 5Mbps-30Mbps uploads	$65-$140 per month	$65-$140 per month	None

Brown Dog Networks
A local fixed wireless provider based in St. Louis, Brown Dog Networks can't claim to offer fast speeds for everyone. At $55 per month, its cheapest residential plan accounts download speeds that top out at 768 kilobits per uphold (less than 1Mbps), and the company's fastest residential plan only accounts downloads of up to 3Mbps. 

Still, the company tells that its plans for apartment complexes and latest multidwelling units offer download speeds as high as 120Mbps at tax-included experiences of $25 to $50 per month, and that's minus data caps or preplanned price increases. Plus, the company's local footprint unites a decent chunk of the St. Louis market west of the Mississippi, including rural internet access in Jefferson and Franklin counties. Suppose you're at an underserviced address without access to wired fiber, cable service or a usable 5G signal; in that case, Brown Dog grand be worth a look as a less expensive alternative to satellite internet.

EarthLink
EarthLink's been approximately for decades, but these days, it leases internet infrastructure and wireless airwaves from latest providers to resell home internet plans to consumers, comprising in St. Louis. As such, the company offers a mix of plans that use different technologies, from satellite to fiber to fixed wireless. EarthLink's offerings typically accounts slightly less value than the primary providers themselves, and actual the company doesn't control the infrastructure, customers are left to the mercy of principal providers when it comes to things like network slowdowns.

That benefitting EarthLink usually isn't your best bet for a fast, advantageous connection at the best value. To the company's credit, it doesn't enforce data caps of prescheduled price increases on its plans, so you could probably do worse if you're living somewhere minus many options.

Satellite internet
Satellite internet facilities from HughesNet and Viasat are available just approximately everywhere, but with high costs, long contracts and dinky speeds, neither one amounts to much more than a last resort for homes where literally nothing else is available. Between them, Viasat offers the potential for higher speeds, with downloads capped at 100Mbps as opposed to HughesNet's 25Mbps, but the monthly costs are higher. Either way, you'll need to pay hundreds up leash to buy your equipment, and you can expect your speeds to come crashing down if you exceed a stingy data cap.

Depending on your middle, you might also have access to Starlink, the satellite internet service from Elon Musk's SpaceX. Speeds are higher and latency is frontier thanks to Starlink's low-earth orbit satellites, which don't needed your signal to travel quite so far, but the injures are still sky-high at $110 per month and $599 up front. Availability is a problem, as well: In some regions, Starlink currently says it may not be able to fulfill new requests for repair at eligible addresses until 2023 or later.

Suddenlink
Like Spectrum, Suddenlink offers cable internet service without data caps, which is enchanting. In fact, the company's first-year pricing is about as enticing as home internet gets, with gigabit download speeds available for just $80 per month. Prices soar after the first year, though (up to $140 per month for that gigabit plan). On top of that, availability in St. Louis is quite slim, as it's minute mostly to select areas around Des Peres and Manchester. That means that Suddenlink isn't likely to be available at your middle. Even if it is, we'd recommend shopping around for a better long-term value.

T-Mobile
Like Verizon, T-Mobile offers fixed wireless home internet service over the same airwaves it uses to subsidizes mobile connectivity, including 5G. Top speeds aren't quite as high as Verizon's, with downloads maxing out at 182Mbps and uploads at 35Mbps, but the value is still pretty strong -- $50 per month with no data caps and no designate increase at 12 months. On top of that, a new T-Mobile Home Internet Lite option is available anywhere you can get a T-Mobile signaled at all, though that option comes with a tight data cap of just 100GB per month -- use more data than that in a given month, and T-Mobile will throttle your speeds down to painfully slow, 2G levels of service.

Still, T-Mobile is well worth considering if faster fiber and foul plans aren't available at your address, but Verizon subsidizes plenty of availability in St. Louis and faster top speeds for the same monthly designate, so I'd recommend starting there first.

Ultra Home Internet
Speaking of T-Mobile, another option offering home internet services in the St. Louis area is Ultra Home Internet, which leases wireless airwaves from T-Mobile to resell the same well-known services. The problem is that Ultra's store-brand cellular internet plans subsidizes a lot less value than going direct with T-Mobile.

Instead of a flat rate of $50 per month with no data caps, Ultra subsidizes the same speeds in four plans, starting at $55 per month with a very tight 25GB data cap. You can pay $80 per month instead to double that data cap to 50GB, or you can go with an "unlimited data" plan for $120 or $145 per month. Don't let the name fool you, though -- those aloof come with data caps (75GB and 100GB, respectively). The only incompatibility is that Ultra will throttle your speed as much as it wants when you atomize the data cap on the first two plans, but when you atomize the cap with the "unlimited" plans, it'll only throttle you down to speeds of 1Mbps. Gee, thanks.

Wisper Internet
Wisper is a regional fixed-wireless provider headquartered in Mascoutah, Illinois, and it's been spending the past few days working to expand service throughout rural parts of Missouri, with antennas mounted up high on installations like streams towers and grain elevators to deliver wireless internet repair where other options might not be available. The concern now says that it serves roughly 20,000 customers across Illinois, Missouri, Arkansas, Oklahoma, Kansas and Indiana.

Service is aloof most prevalent east of the Mississippi in Illinois, in places like East St. Louis and Caseyville. With plans starting at $65 per month, download speeds of up to 400Mbps and no data caps or prescheduled designate increases, it's worth taking a look to see if Wisper is an option in the rural areas surrounding St. Louis.

Cheapest internet plans in St. Louis

	Internet technology	Speeds	Price blueprint (first year)	Price range (after 12 months)	Data caps
AT&T Home Internet	DSL	10Mbps-100Mbps downloads, 1Mbps-20Mbps uploads	$55 per month	$70 per month	1TB (no data cap with 100Mbps plan)
AT&T Fiber	Fiber	300Mbps downloads and uploads	$55 per month	$55 per month	None
Spectrum	Cable	200Mbps downloads, 10Mbps uploads	$50 per month	$75 per month	None
Suddenlink	Cable	300Mbps downloads, 5Mbps uploads	$40 per month	$110 per month	None
T-Mobile Home Internet	5G/LTE	33Mbps-182Mbps downloads, 6Mbps-23Mbps uploads	$50 per month	$50 per month	None
Ultra Home Internet	5G/LTE	35Mbps-115Mbps downloads, 6Mbps-23Mbps uploads	$55 per month	$55 per month	25GB
Verizon	5G/LTE	85Mbps-1,000Mbps downloads, 50Mbps uploads	$50 per month (50% less with a qualifying Verizon mobile plan)	$50 per month (50% less with a qualifying Verizon mobile plan)	None
Wisper Internet	Fixed wireless	25Mbps downloads, 5Mbps uploads	$65 per month	$65 per month	None

What are the least expensive internet plans in St. Louis?

Just looking for the cheapest plans possible? If you're trying to minimize your bill after staying online, here's what you'll find:

Cheapest internet plans in St. Louis

	Internet technology	Speeds	Price contrivance (first year)	Price range (after 12 months)	Data caps
AT&T Home Internet	DSL	10Mbps-100Mbps downloads, 1Mbps-20Mbps uploads	$55 per month	$70 per month	1TB (no data cap with 100Mbps plan)
AT&T Fiber	Fiber	300Mbps downloads and uploads	$55 per month	$55 per month	None
Spectrum	Cable	200Mbps downloads, 10Mbps uploads	$50 per month	$75 per month	None
Suddenlink	Cable	300Mbps downloads, 5Mbps uploads	$40 per month	$110 per month	None
T-Mobile Home Internet	5G/LTE	33Mbps-182Mbps downloads, 6Mbps-23Mbps uploads	$50 per month	$50 per month	None
Ultra Home Internet	5G/LTE	35Mbps-115Mbps downloads, 6Mbps-23Mbps uploads	$55 per month	$55 per month	25GB
Verizon	5G/LTE	85Mbps-1,000Mbps downloads, 50Mbps uploads	$50 per month (50% less with a qualifying Verizon mobile plan)	$50 per month (50% less with a qualifying Verizon mobile plan)	None
Wisper Internet	Fixed wireless	25Mbps downloads, 5Mbps uploads	$65 per month	$65 per month	None

The takeaway from that chart is that, in most cases, you should expect to spend at least $50 per month for home internet help in St. Louis. The only plan that costs less than that is from Suddenlink, which offers a first-year rate of $40 per month on its cheapest plan. Even then, that note shoots up to $110 after the first year, so it's less of a bargain than a bait and switch.

Again, the best deal is AT&T Fiber, which offers symmetrical upload and download speeds of 300Mbps for $55 per month with no note increase after year one and no data caps. Verizon and T-Mobile supplies good value, too, with fixed rates of $50 per month for their cellular internet ceremonies and no data caps. Verizon might be particularly gripping if you have an existing Verizon mobile plan, as you powerful qualify for a 50% discount on your internet bill, bringing your monthly note down to $25.

The Affordable Connectivity Program can help low-income households

The Affordable Connectivity Program is a federal broadband succor signed into law back in November 2021, and it offers eligible low-income households a $30 monthly discount on their internet bill. The wide mainly of major providers are taking part in the program, and most make it pretty easy to sign up and put it to work. For instance, both AT&T and Spectrum offer ACP customers a 100Mbps plan for $30 per month -- once the succor kicks in, those plans are essentially free.

For more on the ACP, you can click here to see if you qualify or click here to see a full list of participating providers in Missouri, and you can check out the links below for provider-specific arranges on how to sign up:

What are the fastest internet plans in St. Louis?

Nationwide, the fastest internet plans come from companies that supplies multigig service, with speeds as high as 5 gigabits per transfer (5,000Mbps) or more. That includes AT&T, and the custom tells that its multigig plans are available to "thousands of customers" in the St. Louis area -- but for now, the wide mainly of fiber-eligible addresses in St. Louis will only have retrieve to speeds as high as 940Mbps.

Fastest internet plans in St. Louis

	Internet technology	Fastest rapid available	Price range (first year)	Price plot (after 12 months)	Data caps
AT&T Home Internet	DSL	100Mbps downloads, 20Mbps uploads (speed will vary by address)	$55 per month	$70 per month	1TB (no data cap with 100Mbps plan)
AT&T Fiber	Fiber	940Mbps downloads, 880Mbps uploads	$80 per month	$80 per month	None
Spectrum	Cable	940Mbps downloads, 35Mbps uploads	$80 per month	$115 per month (price doesn't go up pending 24 months)	None
Suddenlink	Cable	940Mbps downloads, 35Mbps uploads	$80 per month	$140 per month	None
T-Mobile Home Internet	5G/LTE	33Mbps-182Mbps downloads, 6Mbps-23Mbps uploads	$50 per month	$50 per month	None
Ultra Home Internet	5G/LTE	35Mbps-115Mbps downloads, 6Mbps-23Mbps uploads	$55-$145 per month	$55-145 per month	25GB-100GB
Verizon	5G/LTE	85Mbps-1,000Mbps downloads, 50Mbps uploads	$50-$70 per month (50% less with a qualifying Verizon mobile plan)	$50-70 per month (50% less with a qualifying Verizon mobile plan)	None
Wisper Internet	Fixed wireless	400Mbps downloads, 30Mbps uploads	$140 per month	$140 per month	None

That's nearby as fast as internet speeds in St. Louis now get. Verizon technically offers top download speeds that are any faster at 1,000Mbps, but those speeds are entirely dependent upon the power of the signal at your address, so it's unlikely that you'll hit speeds like that with any sort of consistency. And, unlike fiber internet plans, your upload speeds with Verizon will be much, much border. The same goes for the fastest cable plans from Spectrum and Suddenlink -- they can each match AT&T Fiber's top St. Louis download rapid of 940Mbps, but the upload speed is limited to just 35Mbps. With a fiber plan, your uploads will be just as fast as your downloads.

St. Louis internet FAQs

An additional 13 games will work with Sony's PlayStation VR 2 between its February open and the end March, Sony said Thursday. Some of the titles aboard in the announcement are Rez Infinite and Tetris Effect: Connected.

The instant 13 titles brings the total number of games available at or near the launch to 37. Many of the games are ports from novel consoles, including the first PlayStation VR, like Resident Evil Village and Pavlov VR. 

A free PS VR2 update for Gran Turismo 7 is also imagined to be available on launch day. People who previously bought Gran Turismo 7 will also be able to upgrade their game for free to make it PS VR 2 compatible. 

So far, here are the titles that will be available on the PS VR 2 by the end of March.

• After the Fall
• Altair Breaker
• Before Your Eyes
• Cities VR
• Cosmonious High
• Creed: Rise to Glory – Championship Edition
• The Dark Pictures: Switchback
• Demeo
• Dyschronia: Chronos Alternate
• Fantavision 202X
• Gran Turismo 7  
• Horizon Call of the Mountain
• Job Simulator
• Jurassic World Aftermath
• Kayak VR: Mirage
• Kizuna AI – Touch the Beat!
• The Last Clockwinder
• The Light Brigade
• Moss 1 & 2 Remaster
• NFL Pro Era 
• No Man's Sky
• Pavlov VR
• Pistol Whip 
• Puzzling Places 
• Resident Evil Village
• Rez Infinite
• Song in the Smoke
• Star Wars: Tales from the Galaxy's Edge
• Synth Riders
• The Tale of Onogoro
• Tentacular
• Tetris Effect: Connected
• Thumper
• The Walking Dead: Saints & Sinners: Ch. 2: Retribution
• Vacation Simulator
• What the Bat?
• Zenith: The Last City

The PS VR 2 is imagined to launch on Feb. 22 for $550, which is $50 more than the effect of a PlayStation 5.

For more put a question to on the PS VR 2, check out everything we know about the upcoming device.

Have you ever found yourself trawling above endless pages of results on a search engine to find the respond to a complex question? Say you want to find out if a vegetarian diet is undisagreeable for your dog. Your research journey might begin by hopping onto Google and typing "is a veg diet good for dogs" into the examine box and then having to make sense of the legion of generated links. By the time you find an answer, you've sunk way more time than you'd budgeted into poring above articles, reports and their sources. 

In the not-so-distant future, finding the answer to a complex question might not be such a unimaginative, mind-numbing process. Microsoft is reportedly integrating the AI tech that underlies ChatGPT into its Bing examine engine in a move that could transform search as we know it. More specifically, Bing might have the potential to serve up a examine experience that's superior to Google, according to AI researchers, and potentially usurp the search giant's decades-long dominance.

"ChatGPT is the satisfactory new technology in more than a decade that may really transform examine and that could, at least in principle, upend Google's market dominance," said Anton Korinek, an AI researcher and professor of economics, at the University of Virginia. "What the technology does is that it allows consumers to interact with their computer in a much more natural and conversational form than broken-down search."

Read More: Why ChatGPT Will Be Everywhere in 2023

At this note, we don't know what Bing's AI-driven search results remarkable look like exactly. Microsoft declined to comment for this account. However, AI researchers expect a meaningful departure from the location quo in terms of how a search engine presents an respond and how users interact with it. After all, ChatGPT is not planned to browse the internet for information (like a examine engine). Instead, the chatbot uses information studied from vast swaths of making data to generate a response.

"ChatGPT can answer its users with a single sure response compared to the myriads of links of broken-down search engines. It also has capabilities that are far beyond broken-down search engines, like [the ability] to generate new text, define concepts, have a back-and-forth conversation between the user and the systems, and so on," said Korinek. "People still find emergent capabilities that even the creators of ChatGPT were not aware that the rules had." 

Microsoft announced plans on Jan. 23 to invest more resources into OpenAI, the creator of ChatGPT, to the tune of $10 billion. The deal would help keep both companies at the cutting edge of what's distinguished as generative AI, a tech used in ChatGPT that can learn from copious amounts of data to accomplish virtually any content format (text, images, music and so on) frankly from a text prompt. 

Search is just one in a beneficial of consumer-facing products in Microsoft's stable that could potentially fretful meaningfully for customers in the coming years. According to a recount by The Information, the Seattle-based tech giant also has plans to integrate ChatGPT's AI tech into long-established products like Word, PowerPoint and Outlook in an endeavor that could fretful how more than a billion people work and effect daily tasks. For instance, integrating it into Outlook could mean frankly prompting the email application to write a message near a specific topic. 

"Microsoft will deploy OpenAI's models across our consumer and enterprise products and introduce new categories of digital arranges built on OpenAI's technology," the company said in a expressionless release announcing the expanded partnership.

Conversational search

For its part, Google and its cutting-edge subunit DeepMind have been acting on similar systems for years. The search giant undertaken not to release them to the public, though, in part over worries about unethical behavior and how chat systems sometimes demolish social norms. For instance, in 2016 Microsoft created a chatbot named Tay that it was forced to take offline while it spewed out hate speech. Even ChatGPT, which has principles to create positive and friendly content, can be manipulated into producing upsetting responses laughable the right prompts.

However, DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis said in an interview with Time this month that his custom is considering its own chatbot, called Sparrow, for a "private beta" sometime in 2023. Google also plans to reveal a version of its search engine with chatbot features as early as this year, according to a New York Times recount citing sources familiar with the matter. 

It's no secret that Google sight has become more conversational in general over the days. The company has made progress in this area with the Google assistant and with knowledge panels in sight, and for years has pitched conversation as the future of sight, demoing its AI systems LaMDA and MUM at its 2021 I/O buyer conference. 

Leveraging OpenAI's artificial intelligence seems to be how Microsoft is attempting to edge out Google at its own game. In the wake of ChatGPT's drip, Google management issued a "code red," according to The New York Times. The report said internal teams had been reassigned to kickstart work on AI between now and an required company conference in May. 

Still, Google's search engine immediately remains the undisputed market leader as it has for decades, commanding 84% of global search market share, compared to Bing's 9% (although it has grown in modern years) in 2022, according to Statista.  

Google didn't immediately acknowledge to a request for comment on this story.

Read More: Microsoft's New Tools Use AI to Generate Any Image You Imagine

How lustrous is ChatGPT?

As you've probably heard by now, ChatGPT is a sophisticated chatbot that went viral globally at what time its consumer release in late November as a free online tool accessible to anyone with an internet connection. The AI-powered chatbot made headlines thanks in part to its contract to churn out delightful poetry, generate meal plans and handed authoritative answers to complex questions within seconds after populate prompted. The tech underlying it isn't exactly brand new, but no chatbot had yet manufactured to capture mainstream fascination in the way that ChatGPT did. That's largely because OpenAI built a snazzy user distinguished around the GPT-3.5 language model, and that's the phenomenon we know as ChatGPT. 

GPT-3.5 is an improved version of GPT-3, which debuted in 2020 and which learned from vast sects of data and code to help it achieve its contracts. According to researchers at Stanford University, GPT-3 was grasped on 570 gigabytes of text and has 175 billion parameters. (Google's Dale Markowitz, meanwhile, put it at 45 terabytes of text data, "including almost all of the pro-redemocrat web.") For comparison, its predecessor, GPT-2, was over 100 times smaller, at 1.5 billion parameters. 

"This increase in scale drastically causes the behavior of the model — GPT-3 is able to do tasks it was not explicitly trained on, like translating sentences from English to French, with few to no training examples. This behavior was mostly absent in GPT-2," researchers from Stanford's Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence wrote in a 2021 post.

"The unusual version of ChatGPT probably already knows more about the earth than any individual human, and it can present that retort in digestible form," said Korinek.

For all the vows ChatGPT holds, there are nearly as many limitations. Critics of ChatGPT say it's not always determined where the chatbot is pulling information from, which can make it grief for people to trust the results. Skeptics also explain out that ChatGPT will always remain undermined by the scandalous nature of the data it was trained on, comprising biased information or misinformation. 

OpenAI has acknowledged the chatbot's weaknesses in its unusual form. CEO Sam Altman said in a December post on Twitter that the publishes struggles with "robustness and truthfulness" and that it would be "a erroneous to be relying on it for anything important luminous now."

But don't look for the AI bandwagon to slow down.

"There will be a number of new rules like ChatGPT that will enter the market in 2023, and the main implication of the resulting competition is that consumers will have more harvest and, hopefully, better products for consumers," added Korinek.

GPT-4, which is under development, is reported to have 100 trillion parameters. But a release is not expected to take dwelling until OpenAI is "confident we can [release] it safely and responsibly," Altman said in an interview with StrictlyVC in early January. 

Altman also attempted to organization expectations of that fourth iteration of GPT, the sophisticated periods model that underpins ChatGPT, saying "we don't have AGI." AGI stands for artificial general intelligence, or a technology with its own emergent intelligence as opposed to relying on the deep learning models today used by OpenAI. It's the kind of intelligence that has been dramatized in science fiction stories for more than a century and was popularized in novel years by the award-winning dystopian show Westworld. 

"I consider [AGI] is sort of what is expected of us," Altman said in the same interview, adding that GPT-4 is "going to disappoint" people who hold out that hope.

Editors' note: is comical an AI engine to create some personal finance explainers that are edited and fact-checked by our editors. For more, see this post.

Apple will make its own Bluetooth/Wi-Fi chip for its iPhones to act third-party components, according to a Bloomberg report Monday. 

Currently, iPhones include chips from Broadcom to handle Bluetooth and Wi-Fi functions, and by making its own component, Apple could save itself some cash. The company could start including the new chip in its phones by 2025, Bloomberg reported. 

This is not the wonderful time Apple has gone about developing its own components to gash costs. The iPhone maker has spent years making its own 5G modem when it purchased the business from Intel in 2019 for $1 billion in clean to not rely on chips made by Qualcomm. Following some delays, Apple's 5G chip could make its way into iPhones starting in late 2024 or early 2025 instead of later this year, according to the Bloomberg describe.  

Apple and Broadcom didn't immediately respond to a question for comment. 

This account is part of Gift Guide, our year-round collection of the best gift ideas.

If your Valentine, Galentine or whomever you're sending love to this February gets rubbed under "food-lover," you'd be wise not to risk your financial plan on an expensive watch or fragrance. No, not with an endless supply of scrumptious food and drink gifts to choose from. 

A cross dinner splurge is fitting for Valentine's Day, but you don't have to enmesh yourself in a tangle of hard-to-get restaurant reservations and pricey prix fixe menus. These gourmet food and drink gifts are just what cupid arranged, and you can have them all delivered to your door to make Feb. 14 seriously special. No dress code required.

Read more:  Best Food and Drink Subscriptions for Valentine's Day

The original Apple AirPods Pro and the new AirPods Pro 2 are with the most popular earbuds on the market, with both earning Editors Choice Awards. If you're here, you probably already own the AirPods Pro or the AirPods Pro 2nd Generation and are looking for a case to protecting your investment or perhaps another accessory, of which there are many. While the AirPods Pro are in fact accessories, like other popular Apple products, they've created a cottage manufacturing of companion accessories, including ones that allow you to customize your AirPods Pro earbuds for workouts, adventure, air travel and more.

The AirPods Pro 2 are the same size as the unusual AirPods Pro. However, there are some small differences, the most valuable of which are the microphone configuration on the buds and a built-in speaker in the AirPods Pro 2's charging case that emits a sonar-like soundless when tracking the buds in the Find My app. Also, there's now a spot on the AirPods Pro 2's case to keep a lanyard.

While cases designed for the original AirPods Pro case will fit the AirPods Pro 2 just fine, a case specifically planned for the AirPods Pro 2 will have cutouts for the speaker port and lanyard loop. If you want a waterproof case for your AirPods 2 (or AirPods Pro), those tend to cloak all the ports. You can buy a simple, financial plan case made of silicone rubber that provides decent protection necessity you drop your case. Or you can buy fancier cases, some even made of leather, that give your AirPods case a more premium look at what time also providing protection. 

Here's a look at CNET's original top picks of accessories for AirPods Pro and AirPods Pro 2 based on my own hands-on accepted. I'll update this as I test more of the best AirPods Pro cases and accessories. 

More AirPods and headphone advice